06-10-2026, 04:17 PM
I've identified a bug with Comfig 3 - on another thread ref ID 0
Chiu has suggested that I use Comfig 4 that gets over the issue (as far as I can see I've NOT actually uploaded the file live only on non connected PC).
I'm really nervous about using Comfig 4 on older existing Comfort installations.
Please bear in mind that we deal with some large properties that historically have large complex installations. I attach .cclx file of a property we are attending tomorrow. It developed a slave com fault and i have a 'new' slave panel (just purchased from Laser but not ARM !) to change out - the old slave is the large square chip type.
The main CPU is still on firmware 7.194
Can you give me some assurance that if I use Comfig 4 that its not all going to go horribly wrong !
So for example what testing as been done with C4 on larger older comfort installations ?
Has anybody else used C4 on older installs ?
Should I update the firmware to 8 ?
Chiu has suggested that I use Comfig 4 that gets over the issue (as far as I can see I've NOT actually uploaded the file live only on non connected PC).
I'm really nervous about using Comfig 4 on older existing Comfort installations.
Please bear in mind that we deal with some large properties that historically have large complex installations. I attach .cclx file of a property we are attending tomorrow. It developed a slave com fault and i have a 'new' slave panel (just purchased from Laser but not ARM !) to change out - the old slave is the large square chip type.
The main CPU is still on firmware 7.194
Can you give me some assurance that if I use Comfig 4 that its not all going to go horribly wrong !
So for example what testing as been done with C4 on larger older comfort installations ?
Has anybody else used C4 on older installs ?
Should I update the firmware to 8 ?

