View single post by flata4
 Posted: Sunday Sep 15th, 2024 11:28 am
 PM  Quote  Reply  Full Topic 
flata4

 

Joined: Sunday Aug 16th, 2020
Location:  
Posts: 10
Status: 
Offline

  back to top

It's a minor issue but there is no consistency of numbering between UCM Id (set by dip-switch) and their order in the chain #.

As an example I have a system with 3 UCMs set with Id 1, 2 and 4. That system works fine of course.Since there are only 3 UCMs, the number of UCMs should not be reported as 4 in Comfigurator.Interesting email alerts will send messages like "RS485Comms by:  UCM: #3   14/09/2024    20:46:11" so the system is self aware that there is a UCM #3 even if there no Id3.

Is it possible to fix counting of UCMs in Comfigurator?
I have not thought too much about the implications but if Comfigurator is aware of Name and Type of UCMs, why not make the email alerts more explicit with Id, number, Name, Type. Perhaps something like "RS485Comms by:  UCM: Id'4' #3 Name'UCM_KNX2' Type'KNX2' date". Honestly the number #3 does not add much, only the Id is helpful to find the relevant UCM as well as Name and Type of course.

Screenshots are attached one by one over several posts.Thank you

Attachment: controller.png (Downloaded 13 times)

 Close Window