ComfortProtocol

[juwi_uk]

Would it be possible to add an alias (as an enhancement) for the first 64 flags so that you can query these via f? alone or as f?00. Seems pointless to have to enter the extra 00 for the first set.

Julian

<-- Extract from manual --> ....


f? - Query all flags
PC f?00
UCM f?00aabbccddeeffgghh
f?00 Requests for the state of 64 flags starting from Flag 1
The reply gives the status of 64 flags on a bit by bit basis
If there are more than 64 flags in future, f?01 will request for the next 64 flags at one time
aa = Flags 1 to 8 with bit 0 = Flag1
bb = Flags 9 to 16 with bit 0 = Flag 9
cc = Flags 17 to 24 with bit 0 = Flag 17
dd = Flags 25 to 32 with bit 0 = Flag 25
ee = Flags 33 to 48 with bit 0 = Flag 33
ff = Flags 49 to 56 with bit 0 = Flag 49
gg = Flags 57 to 64 with bit 0 = Flag 57
Defined 25 June 2010 Implemented UCM 5.216

[ident]

I dont understan what you mean. Can you give an example of this ehnacement

[juwi_uk]

Sure

At the moment to query the first 64 flags you send f?00 and in future f?01 for next 64 etc.

What I\'m saying that for the first 64 could we just senf f? as an alternive to f?00 too. At tHe moment if you send that you get an NA back.

Julian

[juwi_uk]

...Or better still a single f? sent to Comfort replies back with multiple reponses (f?00...f?nn) so you can request all in one command.

[ident]

But why would sending f? be any more difficult than sending f?00, just another 2 characters.?

There are not plans to add flags yet, but perhaps f?00 could also return the extra information