| Posted: Thursday Jan 9th, 2014 11:08 am |
|
1st Post |
| Posted: Friday Jan 10th, 2014 12:51 am |
|
2nd Post |
ident
Administrator
| Joined: | Wednesday Aug 9th, 2006 |
| Location: | Singapore |
| Posts: | 3493 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Yes the Universal UCM with ethernet supports the RFXLan , one way, ie Comfort can send commands to it. I will look for an application nore
|
| Posted: Friday Jan 10th, 2014 08:20 am |
|
3rd Post |
gjb
Member
| Joined: | Friday Sep 27th, 2013 |
| Location: | United Kingdom |
| Posts: | 36 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
Thanks.
Just to clarify, as I was under the impression that the Universal UCM was capable of two-way communication, are you saying that Comfort will not see any data received by the RFXLAN?
If I have understood this correctly, is there likely to be any two-way support for the RFXLAN in future?
|
| Posted: Friday Jan 10th, 2014 12:17 pm |
|
4th Post |
ident
Administrator
| Joined: | Wednesday Aug 9th, 2006 |
| Location: | Singapore |
| Posts: | 3493 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
The universal UCM is capable of 2 way communications through 1 TCP port, but the RFXLan device requires 2 TCP Ports, 1 in each direction
Hence the UCM is able to talk to this device in 1 direction only
I cannot say if we would go on to develop a 2 way interface, it demands on the demand
|
| Posted: Friday Jan 10th, 2014 12:27 pm |
|
5th Post |
| Posted: Friday Jan 10th, 2014 12:39 pm |
|
6th Post |
ident
Administrator
| Joined: | Wednesday Aug 9th, 2006 |
| Location: | Singapore |
| Posts: | 3493 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
back to top
|
No we have not tried the xPL version yet
|
|
