| Moderated by: slychiu | ||
| Author | Post | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
juwi_uk Member 
|
Would it be possible to add an alias (as an enhancement) for the first 64 flags so that you can query these via f? alone or as f?00. Seems pointless to have to enter the extra 00 for the first set. Julian <-- Extract from manual --> .... f? - Query all flags PC f?00 UCM f?00aabbccddeeffgghh f?00 Requests for the state of 64 flags starting from Flag 1 The reply gives the status of 64 flags on a bit by bit basis If there are more than 64 flags in future, f?01 will request for the next 64 flags at one time aa = Flags 1 to 8 with bit 0 = Flag1 bb = Flags 9 to 16 with bit 0 = Flag 9 cc = Flags 17 to 24 with bit 0 = Flag 17 dd = Flags 25 to 32 with bit 0 = Flag 25 ee = Flags 33 to 48 with bit 0 = Flag 33 ff = Flags 49 to 56 with bit 0 = Flag 49 gg = Flags 57 to 64 with bit 0 = Flag 57 Defined 25 June 2010 Implemented UCM 5.216 |
|||||||||
|
ident Administrator 
|
I dont understan what you mean. Can you give an example of this ehnacement |
|||||||||
|
juwi_uk Member
|
Sure At the moment to query the first 64 flags you send f?00 and in future f?01 for next 64 etc. What I'm saying that for the first 64 could we just senf f? as an alternive to f?00 too. At tHe moment if you send that you get an NA back. Julian |
|||||||||
|
juwi_uk Member
|
...Or better still a single f? sent to Comfort replies back with multiple reponses (f?00...f?nn) so you can request all in one command. |
|||||||||
|
ident Administrator
|
But why would sending f? be any more difficult than sending f?00, just another 2 characters.? There are not plans to add flags yet, but perhaps f?00 could also return the extra information |
|||||||||