| PM | Quote | Reply | Full Topic |
| Joined: | Wednesday Aug 9th, 2006 |
| Location: | Singapore |
| Posts: | 3493 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
Regarding point (2) on your known bugs list; can you expand on this as this sounds like the functionality I need. If I say scan my ucm smarttfit I want it to keep the value stored manually in the cclx file. So this doesn't feel like a bug to me.
This problem is when a module is removed and replaced by an old module but the scan retains the firmware version of the old module
see below
We note your request that the module Type that was manually added should not be replaced when a scan returns 00000
Attachment: scan.jpg (Downloaded 122 times)
| Close Window |